CommandIQ — Integrated Resilience Readiness Analytics
CommandIQ turns integrated-resilience training into a readiness picture a commander can act on. This walkthrough follows the Commander’s Readiness Overview for the 99th Airborne Division — an example division — through suicide-prevention (ACE) analytics: from who is ready to intervene, to where usage and outcomes lag, to which capability and which units need attention, to the pattern underneath. Everything below is aggregate and unit-level; no individual Soldier is ever named or surveilled. The same engine extends to other integrated-resilience topics, including sexual assault prevention and response (SAPR).
Watch the 3-minute video above, or follow the beat-by-beat walkthrough below.
Beat 1 — The Commander’s Readiness Overview
Every commander faces the same suicide-prevention readiness question: across the whole division, who is actually prepared to step in for a struggling Soldier, and who still needs practice? This is the Commander’s Readiness Overview for the 99th Airborne Division — one screen, the entire division. Because the training is peer-to-peer intervention rehearsal, the first thing it shows is coverage: a usage heatmap, brigade by brigade and battalion by battalion. Green units are rehearsing well above the division average; pale-red cells are running cold. At a glance you see where the program has taken hold and where it hasn’t.
Beat 2 — From coverage to outcomes
Coverage isn’t the same as capability, so we switch from usage to outcomes. Across nearly two thousand rehearsed interventions, 82% got the Soldier to safety — and 18% left the Soldier alone. That 18% isn’t a grade; it’s a training signal. It tells you exactly how much room there still is to close the gap before it ever matters in real life.
Beat 3 — The ACE capability profile
The model itself is Ask, Care, Escort — the three moves of a peer intervention. The capability profile breaks the division’s performance down across all three. Here, Care is the strongest, but Ask lags well behind — the hardest step is opening the conversation and asking the question directly. That single insight tells a commander where to aim the next block of rehearsal for the whole division.
Beat 4 — Sentiment and readiness stage
Readiness is more than outcomes, so the same view carries sentiment and stage. Confidence to intervene climbs from a 4.5 before training to an 8 after; effectiveness and willingness to recommend move the same direction — real belief that the rehearsal works. The stage distribution sorts every Soldier from needs-practice up to ready-to-intervene, so you know not just the average, but the shape of readiness across the force.
Beat 5 — At-risk units, triaged for you
The system does the triage for you. The at-risk units card ranks every unit by the rate at which its Soldiers left someone alone — the highest suboptimal rates float to the top. These are the battalions running above the division’s average on the outcome that matters most. This is where a commander spends their attention first.
Beat 6 — Drill into a red unit
Click into one of those units and the picture sharpens. For this cavalry battalion, 40% of the combat-arms group left the Soldier alone — 11 points above the unit’s own average. It’s aggregate only; no individual is ever named. But it points a finger: within the tip-of-the-spear population, the intervention is landing least.
Beat 7 — Filter by tenure: culture, not knowledge
The demographic breakdown tells you why it isn’t just a knowledge gap. Filter by time in service and the story inverts what you’d expect: the newest Soldiers do fine, while the longest-tenure group — 43% of them — is the one leaving Soldiers alone. That’s not people who never learned the material. That’s a culture and command-climate signal, the kind a commander can actually act on. The same analytics engine tracks other integrated-resilience topics the same way — sexual assault prevention and response (SAPR), for one — so a single readiness picture can span the whole resilience portfolio.
Beat 8 — The whole point
From one division-wide screen, a commander moves from who’s ready, to where usage and outcomes lag, to which capability, to which units, to the exact pattern underneath — all from aggregate training rehearsal, never individual surveillance. Suicide-prevention readiness you can see, and act on, before it ever becomes a crisis.
Related — Learn more
Start with the overview
Related articles